WRT > The usual mechanism to address this is to require more than one clinically trained person to agree, which holds them for a few days until it can be heard

WRT > The usual mechanism to address this is to require more than one clinically trained person to agree, which holds them for a few days until it can be heard in court and decided by a judge. It seems the above would only work (meaning that it would prevent abuse) if: a) the 'clinically trained persons' affiliate with different political fractions b) there is no 'federal-level' oversight hammer that can strip them of their credentials for testifying against the wants of the currently ruling political fractions c) The judiciary system overall is free from 'selective-outrage' ( Which is, unfortunately, some would say, not the case for US, Canada, France, UK, Australia, not even mentioning known oligarch/dictatorships countries out there )