> it's just splitting code into functions I feel you underestimate the concept of "function". We all tend to do that because they are abstractions so ubiquitio

> it's just splitting code into functions I feel you underestimate the concept of "function". We all tend to do that because they are abstractions so ubiquitious that we cannot even imagine world without them. But it was not always so. Here's the first time someone speculates about "subroutines" (1953): https://web.archive.org/web/20150628022047/http://www.laputan.org/pub/papers/wheeler https://web.archive.org/web/20150628022047/http://www.laputa...