4 ms·
But it's so elegant! Just make sure they all implement a `interface DoAble { void doIt() }` and we can make a generic do!
by dtech 8y ago
But it's so elegant! Just make sure they all implement a `interface DoAble { void doIt() }` and we can make a generic do!
- tempodox 8y agoExactly! And all the dynamic contextualization and dependencies of each `doIt` are gathered by the standard Clairvoyance module. However, this is still incredibly verbose compared to the pinnacle of elegance discovered as early as the 1960s: TRANSFORM THE CURRENT OBJECT INTO THE DESIRED OBJECT. None of those modern wimp languages has reached that level of terseness yet.
- myWindoonn 8y agoHave a cookie. You can have another one if you source your concept and cite the prior work; your handwave is useless against a search engine, which turns up this phrase only in your posts on this site. 'When someone says "I want a programming language in which I need only say what I wish done," give him a lollipop.' ~ Perlis [0] http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html