The kicker is that he will only do that if they use his company, as explained in the article. While I agree that nuclear energy is basically required at this p

The kicker is that he will only do that if they use his company, as explained in the article. While I agree that nuclear energy is basically required at this point in order to ween humans off of lighting crap they get out of the ground on fire, bill's antics may not be the best option (can his company deliver? others have already done so.. so why not them instead? it will require more than $2bn... so tax dollars required.)