From " people don’t look to other languages because you can’t do something in c++, but more often because you can." For me it comes across that you can do in r

From " people don’t look to other languages because you can’t do something in c++, but more often because you can." For me it comes across that you can do in rust what you can do in c++. As for any reasoning for the change, be it learn-play, a more sane way of doing things, flavour of the month, or something else entirely. I had a look for a rust vs C++, having limited exposure of the later and none of the former, and found this comparison insightful https://www.apriorit.com/dev-blog/520-rust-vs-c-comparison https://www.apriorit.com/dev-blog/520-rust-vs-c-comparison But you may be right, if your referring to some unsavory aspects of c++ that rust may well avoid or obfuscate away from the coders train of thoughts.