Thanks for comparing C++ templates to Rust's macro system and not to Rust's generics. The template system that C++ has is actually closer to Rust macros than it

Thanks for comparing C++ templates to Rust's macro system and not to Rust's generics. The template system that C++ has is actually closer to Rust macros than it is to Rust generics, and I think a common misconception. This is e.g. something that people who complain that C++ has const generics while Rust doesn't should keep in mind.