3 ms·
There is no theoretical reason you can’t maintain two histories—-e.g. when rebasing have a “rebase-merge” commit that has the hash of the other tree, and option
by garmaine 8y ago
There is no theoretical reason you can’t maintain two histories—-e.g. when rebasing have a “rebase-merge” commit that has the hash of the other tree, and optionally keep that history around in the git repo. Then you could do a ‘git blame —orig’ or whatever to switch between immutable and cleaned up history.
No VCS I’m aware of supports this. But they COULD.
- pseudalopex 8y agoYour suggestion is more flexible, but a simple way to group commits is to preserve the original branch structure like Mercurial.