4 ms·
it's auto-generated - it says so at the top. i don't see the point of this at all since you could reproduce by simply searching "survey" or "introduction". at m
by mlevental 8y ago
it's auto-generated - it says so at the top. i don't see the point of this at all since you could reproduce by simply searching "survey" or "introduction". at minimum a cite count would've been helpful to distinguish well written ones from poorly written ones
- yorwba 8y agoThe list of terms to include/exclude looks like it has taken some trial and error to compile: https://github.com/impredicative/arxiv-ml-reviews/blob/master/arxivmlrev/_config/terms.csv https://github.com/impredicative/arxiv-ml-reviews/blob/maste... For example, it excludes "aerial survey", "peer review" and similar false positives.
- joker3 8y agoIt'd be easy to split them by year or subject, as that's provided by the arXiv.
- painful 8y agoJust how is the subject provided by arXiv? By subject, do you mean the categorization such as stat.ML, cs.AI, etc.?