4 ms·
While those are good traits in general, they don't narrow down on good interview questions very well. For example, I (non seriously) propose chess puzzles for
by jammygit 8y ago
While those are good traits in general, they don't narrow down on good interview questions very well.
For example, I (non seriously) propose chess puzzles for interviews then:
Objective - the process avoids human bias
Inclusive - anyone can learn chess, and its played internationally.
Risk Averse - Avoids false positives since the puzzles are hard
Relevant - it properly tests the abilities needed for a coding job, like focus, dedication, intelligence, and preparation. Edit: I have friends in cs classes who have had to implement knight tours and queen puzzles for class as well, so its even cs relevant!
Scales - this will be used for tens of thousands of interviews.
Easy-to-do - this will need to be done by hundreds/thousands of engineers, who would probably rather be coding.
Really, I think 'relevant' is the category most people contest.
Note: chess really is a great game