3 ms·
There seems to be an impulse to deny the AI progress that people see in front of them. When IBM Watson won on Jeopardy, everyone claimed it was cheating because
by ggggtez 8y ago
There seems to be an impulse to deny the AI progress that people see in front of them. When IBM Watson won on Jeopardy, everyone claimed it was cheating because, after all, "everyone knows the answers, so Jeopardy is really only about who presses the button first". But what about the fact that a computer could know the answers at all, and so quickly? Many people didn't think it was possible, and as soon as it happens they attack the speed of the button press as if knowing the answer wasn't the hard part.
Anyone with this point of view does not seem to understand what is being shown here. This is not just "this ai beat this one player in this one match". It's an entire system of techniques for machine learning. The AI was not hard coded to learn those micro steps, like all other AIs have been. To ignore those things is to miss the point entirely.
- porpoisely 8y agoExactly. It's not like the AI of the past where it was essentially flowchart plus heuristics. Now, it's almost "experiential". It's tries paths and essentially sees which ones work and which don't and "learns" from it. It's similar to Dr Strange in Avengers using the Time Stone to try out possible futures to see which ones work.
- bo1024 8y agoI see your point and partially agree. But I think part of the problem with these kinds of stunts (for lack of a better word) is it's hard to tell the difference between actual scientific advancements and benefits of throwing hundreds of years of GPU time at it.