4 ms·
That sounds a lot like their interviewing style — treating people like cogs by reading from a script. Instead of immediate feedback and interaction the results
by akvadrako 8y ago
That sounds a lot like their interviewing style — treating people like cogs by reading from a script. Instead of immediate feedback and interaction the results are sent to a committee for analysis.
It is almost by definition more objective but there isn't evidence it achieves better results. It doesn't seem worth the cost; most people appreciate being treated like people.
- cmrdporcupine 8y agoIt makes sense for a company of Google's size, where there's an endless pool of candidates. What I don't understand is why so many small companies are eager to copy Google's interview process. It's not for them.