3 ms·
> If courts are too overloaded, then we need more courts or we need to change the laws/processes that overload them. This is certainly true, but many parties a
by coryfklein 8y ago
> If courts are too overloaded, then we need more courts or we need to change the laws/processes that overload them.
This is certainly true, but many parties are mutually benefited by resolving some disputes via a neutral arbiter rather than the courts. It's just another example of where private companies can be more efficient than legal bodies.
There are just more inherent costs in a legal court of law.
- CogitoCogito 8y agoI don’t disagree, but I don’t believe this is an argument against my claim that the choice of whether a dispute should go to arbitration should not be made before the dispute arises.