4 ms·
Most democracies run a parliamentary system, where the head of government has to have the support of parliament. There's no separation between government/execut
by dalbasal 8y ago
Most democracies run a parliamentary system, where the head of government has to have the support of parliament. There's no separation between government/executive from parliament.
The point being that if a prime minister can't reach an agreement with parliament on some core issue (like annual budgets), they cease being the PM. Usually this means a new election.
The US's checks and balances means that parliament and government can be in opposition to eachother, and prevent eachother from doing what they want. The president/government can veto legislation and parliament can de-fund government.
This current manifestation is an odd one because the President is de-funding government, which is de-funding his own stuff. This is because the convention of "shutdown" already existed.
- NeedMoreTea 8y agoWell don't look too hard at the UK right now. :) We have a government and PM that is effectively stuck there (thanks to the coalition's broken Fixed Term Parliaments Act) but unable to bring legislation through. They even lost a vote on the last finance bill, and the huge Brexit defeat. Either would normally have brought the government down. Belgium famously managed with no government for well over a year, without apparently making big decisions like finance or defence changes.