4 ms·
but they can't be the source because their design implies a designer
by notus 8y ago
but they can't be the source because their design implies a designer
- linsistine 8y agoSo you've accepted the logic that all designs have a designer. But now you attempt to debunk the logic by saying, "Surely the Creator has a creator too, right?". But we've already established that the idea that all designs have a designer, all creations have a creator, is more logical than for something to come into existence, from nothing, with no creator, for no reason, and out of randomness.
- notus 8y agoI'm only accepting the logic for the sake of the argument, I don't actually accept it. I'm just pointing out that accepting the logic is dissonant because at some point you have to deny the logic.
- linsistine 8y agothen what logic do you accept?