> the broker is now a conversation participant as well. I don't agree. This is the antithesis of the intent of the term "end to end encryption." Otherwise yo

> the broker is now a conversation participant as well. I don't agree. This is the antithesis of the intent of the term "end to end encryption." Otherwise you could just use TLS to secure each of the {client->broker} connections and then you could call it "end to end".