3 ms·
A key difference is that software is already covered by copyright. Identical copies violate copyright for software. For a mechanical device, identical copies
by jofer 8y ago
A key difference is that software is already covered by copyright. Identical copies violate copyright for software. For a mechanical device, identical copies generally don't violate copyright (trademarks, text, etc aside).
Mechanical devices need patents for the design, as a competitor can easily re-implement an absolutely identical design. It's often clear by inspection how it's made. A different device that accomplishes the same task in a slightly different way doesn't infringe on the patent.
Software already has protection against identical copies through copyright. The key difference is that software patents go farther; they claim to cover the concept. Any implementation of the concept violates the patent. Re-implementing software to accomplish the same mathematical concept in a different way still violates the patent.
- pnw_hazor 8y agoPatents protect how something is done. Copyrights protect what you make (e.g.,. expression of idea).
- andrekandre 8y agothe “expression of idea” is precisely “how something is done” or am i missing something... idea: superhuman who flys around saving people expression: superman, alternative expression: ultraman both protected respectively by copyright (imagery, stories, movies etc)... do they also need patents? i think the answer here is “no” and it’s the same for software... but again, please correct if i’m missing something edit: spelling/formatting