I realise I muddled my words in the previous comment, but I think you get the point. WSJ themselves are welcoming of non-paying readers from certain channels.

I realise I muddled my words in the previous comment, but I think you get the point. WSJ themselves are welcoming of non-paying readers from certain channels. So it seems a bit mean-spirited to hound people and liken them to criminals for doing what the publisher welcomes under only marginally different circumstances.