I don't see any material online indicating that programs written for one-instruction-set-computers are more parallelizable than programs written for traditional

I don't see any material online indicating that programs written for one-instruction-set-computers are more parallelizable than programs written for traditional computers. In fact, here is someone claiming the opposite: > The disadvantage of an MISC is that instructions tend to have more sequential dependencies, reducing overall instruction-level parallelism. https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Minimal_instruction_set_computer.html https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1m...