4 ms·
If the workers are capable of doing this, then they wouldn't need a union. They would represent themselves against management.
by icelancer 8y ago
If the workers are capable of doing this, then they wouldn't need a union. They would represent themselves against management.
- vkou 8y agoNo, they couldn't, because unless you bargain collectively, you have a lot more to lose in these negotiations, then your boss does. You derive 100% of your income from your employer. Your employer derives ~0.01%-1% of their income from you.
- chimeracoder 8y ago> No, they couldn't, because unless you bargain collectively, you have a lot more to lose in these negotiations, then your boss does. You derive 100% of your income from your employer. Your employer derives ~0.01%-1% of their income from you. You derive 100% of your income from your union membership, which is a mandatory term of your employment. Your union derives ~0.01%-1% of their income from you. (It actually derives even less than that, because it operates as a syndicate representing workers across multiple employers).