4 ms·
> This conversation isn't about equal access. You're right. It's about workers rights. I'm telling you that I think construing the ability of workers to effect
by danharaj 8y ago
> This conversation isn't about equal access.
You're right. It's about workers rights. I'm telling you that I think construing the ability of workers to effectively organize as a convenience is also an insulting stance. In fact, I'm glad I chose an example that you find important. Maybe you can consider the possibility that there is a higher principle at work, maybe one that is as important to society as equal access is.
- austincheney 8y ago> Maybe you can consider the possibility that there is a higher principle at work I would have started with that. At this point you are shifting ground to qualify an indefensible position on a topic that isn't that important.
- danharaj 8y agoThe only purpose of my example was to show that in general the implication that ease of use reduces to convenience is false. I used an obvious counterexample. In summary, to imply that I think your assertion that it's about convenience is unjustified and off-base. If you think I was drawing an equivalence between the two situations, then I apologize for not being clear.