2 ms·
Intelligence? 100%. Sociability? 100%‡. What I think you're asking about is tool use. Given roughly infinite time, is there a reason to think that the combo of
by mLuby 8y ago
Intelligence? 100%. Sociability? 100%‡. What I think you're asking about is tool use.
Given roughly infinite time, is there a reason to think that the combo of social + tool users would not win over, say social + raw strength? Imagine perhaps that lions gain the ability to sweat and so can expand their range dramatically. Would the next tool users never achieve dominance over them/be relegated to a small habitat?
I find it hard to imagine tool users not winning long-term, but it's possible that intelligent non-tool users never let them amass the necessary population/skills/tools. Maybe something like the xenomorphs?
‡The only case I could think of is where some organism absorbs prey to continually gain power. But at a certain point it's either unable to grow its geographic reach or it's basically a collection of physically separate social sub-creatures.