Oh computers can make the risk/reward calculations, their criteria for risk and reward is wholly in the hands of who develops the logic. and there in lies the

Oh computers can make the risk/reward calculations, their criteria for risk and reward is wholly in the hands of who develops the logic. and there in lies the problems for companies developing these systems. with current law they would be liable for any negative outcome. logs would be required to be kept and every decision would surely be pulled apart by whatever paid experts each side can find. so without legislation, legislation the consumer must be very wary about, comes about limiting liability to such systems they will have to side with caution and even then every event is a lawsuit waiting to happen. finally, would you or anyone you know trust a system which states it can do something you find adversely risky to actually do with you or your loved ones at risk? what would that take? it might simply be a decision of local values