4 ms·
> it knows with 100% certainty that it has an unbeatable hand While your example is a good one, the bot actually doesn't have an unbeatable hand. Another play
by daeken 16y ago
> it knows with 100% certainty that it has an unbeatable hand
While your example is a good one, the bot actually doesn't have an unbeatable hand. Another player could have trips or 4/5 of a straight flush and hit a better hand (quads or a straight flush) on the turn/river. Or the board could pair twice and give someone a full house. Unlikely in any case, but not out of the realm of possibilities by any means.
- icey 16y agoHaha damnit, you're right. Thanks for pointing that out!
- jpwagner 16y agoanyone with 130k hands would've caught that :) but seriously, he means if the board is like: 2c 3c 7c Tc 4h, (not that he'd get much value from the guy with the lone Jc, though) think of how easy squeezing is with two colluding bots.
- icey 16y agoThe problem was that I changed the example after typing everything up. The first contrived example I came up with used a hand that Bot 1 wouldn't have realistically thrown away. My fault for not proof-reading :D