4 ms·
Sure, education is draining rural areas even without student loans, but they make the problem worse. And this effect is even more pronounced when we move focus
by usrusr 8y ago
Sure, education is draining rural areas even without student loans, but they make the problem worse. And this effect is even more pronounced when we move focus one level of urbanization higher:
Truly rural areas just don't have that many highly qualified positions outside the medical field. But in their regional capitals, definitely not what you would call a town anymore, every position exists that you would also finds in a world class metropolis, just on a much lower payscale. That's where much of the education-caused movement would go in absence of student debt. But when you add debt to the equation, the lure of first tier metropolis money turns from "but on the other hand, cost of living etc" to an offer you cannot reject.
- rahimnathwani 8y agoYour explanation is plausible, but people early in their career are always short of money, with or without student loans: Need to save a large down payment to buy a home => Better to move to the city where I can save more $$ each year Need to pay down a large student debt => Better to move to the city where I can pay down more $$ of my debt each year I'm not disagreeing with you: student debts make the hole larger, so strengthen the effect. But the effect is large in any case (due to most of us being born with a 'short position' on housing).