4 ms·
Scoble responds to our HN discussion: http://twitter.com/#!/Scobleizer/status/3154038992412672 http://twitter.com/#!/Scobleizer/status/3154038992412672
by klochner 16y ago
Scoble responds to our HN discussion:
http://twitter.com/#!/Scobleizer/status/3154038992412672 http://twitter.com/#!/Scobleizer/status/3154038992412672
- devmonk 16y agoInstead of tweeting and cinching, why not just click the reply link? There are plenty on the page.
- eagleal 16y agoBecause he can change your perception of the message a lot more narrating it than by writing it down (which is something cold). Or he's just lazy to type it.
- aaronbrethorst 16y agoScoble's blog post's thesis was 'Google could never build Instagram.' He seems to have changed his argument: 'guys, you don't get it, Instagram is innovative!' Clearly Instagram is on to something, and I think they are doing some innovative work, but that has nothing to do with whether or not Google could build this. Also, a stopped clock is still right twice a day: sure, Scoble was right about Twitter (and possibly right about Foursquare...we'll see), but he seems to call everything innovative and exciting. The products that flop are swept under the rug and forgotten, and the ones that make it are trumpeted as evidence of prescience.