>They didn’t even cover the racist stuff said against the kids. Do you seriously not understand the point of that statement being made to people wearing MAGA h

>They didn’t even cover the racist stuff said against the kids. Do you seriously not understand the point of that statement being made to people wearing MAGA hats? Notice I said understand, not agree with. Because labeling statements that are designed to use the absurdity of the MAGA's hatters position on various topics as a rhetorical tool against themselves as "racist" in order to fabricate some sort of "gotchya" talking point tells me you don't. >I unsubscribed from the NYTimes over this. Spare me.