>Yes it is, but you aren't going to solve it without rolling back women's rights. The economic pressure to work to support your family is not what I would call

>Yes it is, but you aren't going to solve it without rolling back women's rights. The economic pressure to work to support your family is not what I would call a right, but a modern requirement (of both men and women). If anything, this is an advancement of an employers right to extract cheap labor while maintaining a moral high ground in the name of equality and phony, corporate backed, dollars-and-cents egalitarianism. >It was bad when we as a society told women they're not allowed to work. To be clear I agree, and, upon further inspection, so do you: :-) >Now women have to work just to be able to afford a house on two incomes which previously cost only one. Posting anyway because maybe there's something to be said about the choice of words ('rights' to work) here, which should perhaps be considered for rephrasing en masse (as I'm sure you're aware, but was not explicitly said).