4 ms·
I see what you mean. However, what I mean is "what's so great about a brilliant person being in charge of a poor product". So I'm saying "Dalton is a brilliant
by maxklein 16y ago
I see what you mean. However, what I mean is "what's so great about a brilliant person being in charge of a poor product". So I'm saying "Dalton is a brilliant guy, but I am skeptical of if just a brilliant person makes that great of a difference, when the product is not so extra-ordinary".
The first sentence could better be said: "What's so great about Dalton being there?"
Yes, I am dismissing this company, and I know it's risky to publicly state something like that, but I really feel that the product does not warrant the investment of 5million in any way. It's a good product, and it will surely be successful and have a number of users, but I doubt it will become any kind of force.
Take a look at the download numbers, according to techcrunch they have had 100.000 downloads since MAY. So between may and october, they have 100k downloads (http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/13/picplz-launches-revamped-mobile-apps-for-iphone-and-android-with-free-effects/ http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/13/picplz-launches-revamped-mo...).
With my crap apps, I have 15k downloads a day. So in a week, I'd have that number of downloads. It's not hard to do that. That guy Kreci had 200k+ downloads on some weird apps on the android store also in a couple of months.
The product is not right. Even smart guys can have bad products, and from what I read, those twitter dudes gave back the investment money on their original product, so the investment is not just in the people, it's also in the product.
So I feel that there is a bit of a bubble there, where people are just being handed money based off reputation without proper diligence being paid to the product.
- iamelgringo 16y agoIt's not really about the product, it's about the person. That's what is getting funded. You can build a fart app, create a little drama around it and get 100k downloads. I've heard Dalton speak twice. The first was at "WorkataStartup". I had never met him, or heard of him, but after hearing his pitch that day, I said to myself, "I'd almost be willing to sign up with PicPlz just to work along side Dalton". But, I have my own startup. I heard Dalton speak at startup school, and what impressed me was his command over the financial and legal ramifications of music startups. I've come across a number of people doing music startups via Hackers and Founders, and I've never met anyone so well versed or educated about the business end of music, licensing, etc... The, I met Dalton at this party at Andreesen Horowitz last month[1], and I made a point of talking with Dalton for 15-20 minutes. Once again came away quite impressed by the man. And, in the Q&A with Michael Ovitz[2], Dalton made one of the best points about the future of the music industry and media business that I've heard in a long time. I think I have a halfway decent nose for founder talent. I run one of the largest startup/tech meetups in Silicon Valley[3], and I've seen a lot of founders come and go over the last 3 years. If I were a VC, I'd be tripping over myself to have Dalton take money from me. If it's not photo sharing, it will be something else, but either way, I'd lay money on Dalton having a good exit on one of his startups. ref: [1] http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_46/b4203000012271.htm http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_46/b42030000... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ovitz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ovitz [3] http://www.hackersandfounders.com http://www.hackersandfounders.com