4 ms·
The original title is far more honest, but still sensational, while the actual paper is a good read. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/1/eaau3333 http:/
by toufiqbarhamov 8y ago
The original title is far more honest, but still sensational, while the actual paper is a good read.
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/1/eaau3333 http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/1/eaau3333
It’s totally free too.
- sytelus 8y agoIn what way its dishonest? I'm not in the field so I can comment on technical points but looking at abstract, article seems to have good representation of the conclusion.