4 ms·

>The analogy with the US fails unless you are claiming the Venezuelan election was fair. Actually it does not. You're assuming that I claim the US election was

>The analogy with the US fails unless you are claiming the Venezuelan election was fair. Actually it does not. You're assuming that I claim the US election was also fair, legal and representative. >they were actually forbidden to vote for their desired candidate Votes are still cast on secret ballots, so I don't understand how that would even work. >It's a coup against an autocrat - the only way to get rid of one. Really? A US-instigated military coup is the only way? Historical[1] events[2] seem[3] to show otherwise. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_I... 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnation_Revolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnation_Revolution 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution

yholio 8y ago
> Votes are still cast on secret ballots, so I don't understand how that would even work. It's quite easy: jail the respective candidates and remove them from the ballot. > Really? A US-instigated military coup is the only way? The position of the US government could be seen as an improvement from earlier calls for a direct military intervention. As long as they do not finance or advise the contenders, lending them international credibility is a standard foreign policy move that doesn't fall under "instigation". The political rift was there and the US should of course applaud any developments in line with their previous foreign policy position, strongly against the Chavez/Maduro regime. Of course, given the history of the US-Venezuela relations, it's hard to believe US will limit itself to mere diplomatic actions.
- omegaworks 8y ago
  >The position of the US government could be seen as an improvement Doesn't mean it's not still wrong. >As long as they do not finance or advise the contenders Too late. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/08/world/americas/donald-trump-venezuela-military-coup.html?module=inline https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/08/world/americas/donald-tru...

yholio 8y ago

> Votes are still cast on secret ballots, so I don't understand how that would even work. It's quite easy: jail the respective candidates and remove them from the ballot. > Really? A US-instigated military coup is the only way? The position of the US government could be seen as an improvement from earlier calls for a direct military intervention. As long as they do not finance or advise the contenders, lending them international credibility is a standard foreign policy move that doesn't fall under "instigation". The political rift was there and the US should of course applaud any developments in line with their previous foreign policy position, strongly against the Chavez/Maduro regime. Of course, given the history of the US-Venezuela relations, it's hard to believe US will limit itself to mere diplomatic actions.

omegaworks 8y ago
>The position of the US government could be seen as an improvement Doesn't mean it's not still wrong. >As long as they do not finance or advise the contenders Too late. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/08/world/americas/donald-trump-venezuela-military-coup.html?module=inline https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/08/world/americas/donald-tru...