3 ms·
I don't see how those adjectives add any clarity to the situation, since you can swap them out interchangeably and you're still describing the same vague, handw
by ad_hominem 8y ago
I don't see how those adjectives add any clarity to the situation, since you can swap them out interchangeably and you're still describing the same vague, handwavy sense of racism somewhere being a cause for an unequal outcome.
Larry Elder had an interesting take on "systemic racism" IMO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
- tunesmith 8y agoThis isn't about unequal outcomes, it's about racist/sexist outcomes. It's very possible to have unequal outcomes without them being racist/sexist. And despite what seems to be commonly believed, liberals/left/progressives/democrats/etc don't tend to have a problem with that. It's also not vague and handwavy. If you'd like to explore an example of institutional racism, check out the Parable of the Polygons. It's a clear, simple model with repeatable results. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_Polygons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_Polygons https://ncase.me/polygons/ https://ncase.me/polygons/