3 ms·
I think it's possible, but you would need peices to draw off of: Google uses U.N. translations to train their algorithms, but how many documents do we have tran
by klbarry 16y ago
I think it's possible, but you would need peices to draw off of: Google uses U.N. translations to train their algorithms, but how many documents do we have translating legalese into good english, or poor writing into great writing? Probably not more than a couple hundred.
- danohuiginn 16y agoWe have documents that have gone through an editing process, with changes tracked from draft through to published article. I'm thinking particularly here of the process inside, say, a news agency. Many of the changes made by sub-editors are fairly mechanical modifications, to conform to a standard style. They might well be sufficiently repetitive to train a 'translator'. You could also take a corpus of 'good' and a corpus of 'bad' writing, and compare the features in each. sentence length, constructions used. Origin of words would be an interesting one ('never use a Latinate word where an Anglo-Saxon one will do'). Unfortunately, most of the difference between good and bad writing is in the ordering of ideas; you can't really deal with that on statistical grounds.