2 ms·
The argument the article is trying to make is that as bets go, it's actually not a good one. It's not obvious we should spend the money on a larger collider for
by throwawaymath 8y ago
The argument the article is trying to make is that as bets go, it's actually not a good one. It's not obvious we should spend the money on a larger collider for no other reason than "because scientific progress." There is much more nuance to it than that.