2 ms·
Not only is it not sexy, it's probably the most work. You're now administering the server, storage & the database; you're the DBA for your Oracle instance and d
by ticmasta 8y ago
Not only is it not sexy, it's probably the most work. You're now administering the server, storage & the database; you're the DBA for your Oracle instance and databases; Oracle loves to hammer this scenario for licensing (they'd rather you pay for their "cloud") and paying a premium for the underlying hardware that needs to managed remotely.
I can understand why this is a no-go for the GP.
- dijit 8y agoYeah, I understand it too; We're currently being squeezed by MS licensing in GCP (but it's basically free in Azure!). This is the cost of lock-in. Personally I'd rather have the expertise on staff than pay oracle (and microsoft) for this shitty behaviour.