4 ms·
And I already found an error in it. The Kannada script has evidence of it existed at least since 400 AD, but the website shows it as 1500 AD (?). Additionally,
by a2dictator 8y ago
And I already found an error in it. The Kannada script has evidence of it existed at least since 400 AD, but the website shows it as 1500 AD (?).
Additionally, the Vedic scripts would be much much older than what is depicted - circa 7,000 BC
- mcguire 8y agoWhere can I read more about the Vedic scripts?
- dilippkumar 8y ago> Additionally, the Vedic scripts would be much much older than what is depicted - circa 7,000 BC That can’t be correct. The proto-Indo-European language has an upper bound at somewhere near 4,500BC if I recall correctly [0] [0] https://press.princeton.edu/titles/8488.html https://press.princeton.edu/titles/8488.html
- a2dictator 8y agoIndo-European is a concocted story just to show that nothing original ever came from India / Indians. It was a fabricated language to show that Latin is as old as if not older than Sanskrit / Indian languages.