3 ms·

> But to single them out for "fake news" labelling is worryingly arbitrary. Wikipedia did it in 2017 - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikip

> But to single them out for "fake news" labelling is worryingly arbitrary. Wikipedia did it in 2017 - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia... It's not like this is a random bolt from the blue.

ihattendorf 8y ago
But Wikipedia isn't my browser. I don't think anyone is arguing that Daily Mail isn't garbage, just that it isn't the browser's job to decide what is and isn't garbage.