> The fact that you allocated a top level URL for it is embarrassing (https://cloud.google.com/twitter/ https://cloud.google.com/twitter/). Can you imagine if A

> The fact that you allocated a top level URL for it is embarrassing (https://cloud.google.com/twitter/ https://cloud.google.com/twitter/). Can you imagine if Amazon advertised https://aws.amazon.com/netflix/ https://aws.amazon.com/netflix/? It's a case study. Google didn't create a one-off URL for Twitter, but have the same URL pattern for all their public case studies: - https://cloud.google.com/chilean-healthcare/ https://cloud.google.com/chilean-healthcare/ - https://cloud.google.com/now-ims/ https://cloud.google.com/now-ims/ - etc. Amazon has absolutely the same, except that their URL is slightly different, but I didn't think that there is a URL police which determines which URLs are considered embarrassing for case studies and which not: https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/netflix/ https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/netflix/