8 ms·
> Chrome made web browsing/dev pleasant like Firefox/Firebug did and it really took off being based on Webkit like Safari which also worked well on mobile. Thi
by aylmao 8y ago
> Chrome made web browsing/dev pleasant like Firefox/Firebug did and it really took off being based on Webkit like Safari which also worked well on mobile.
This is the big one for me. When I'm not developing I actually prefer to use Safari-- I like it's interface better and it feels more at home in macOS. It's "good enough" too.
What I'm really a user of is the Chrome Dev Tools. Firefox's are looking quite solid lately but I just haven't switched over.
- MarsAscendant 8y agoWhat I'd love is to have Firefox dev tools functionality in Chrome. Firefox highlights the edge lines of the selected element automatically, and in all directions (if I recall correctly). I have to use an extension – VisBug – to achieve that in Chrome. There's also the fonts window, which lets you in on what fonts are used on the page, and lets you modify the selected element's font settings – size, weight, slant/italic etc.. I pay a lot of attention to typography, so that part is important to me.
- bad_user 8y agoWhy not just use Firefox?
- MarsAscendant 8y agoMy liking one thing about Firefox needn't entail my wanting to use the whole browser.
- Zardoz84 8y agoyou should try it again.
- bad_user 8y agoThere's plenty to like about Firefox, like the Awesome Bar, has better bookmarking, is able to handle a huge number of tabs, has the "Multi-Account Containers" extension (with its offspring, e.g. "Facebook Container"), or the "Tree Style Tab" extension, just to name a few. Also that it's not Chrome or based on Chromium is reason alone to like Firefox, because we need diversity for healthy web standards. That Chromium is open source is a red herring and open standards are more important. I know developers have been preferring Chrome and for good reasons, but I've switched back to Firefox for the last 3 years and personally I find it hard to use Chrome these days, because Firefox has a better UI. The only downside is that Chrome's dev tools still has some capabilities that Firefox lacks, but Firefox has been improving a lot, as you have seen.
- MarsAscendant 8y ago...and that's why I don't take part in the discussion about browsers. It's gotten political. You advertise shit to me, when I didn't ask you to. I tried Firefox for a month. I didn't like it. I went back to a Chromium fork. Now go away.
- youwishboye 8y agowow, what a pretentious asshole
- CalRobert 8y agoA person politely making some points in favour of Firefox in a discussion about browsers does not merit a rude response.
- MarsAscendant 8y ago1. I never asked for any of that response, nor did the situation imply that I needed to learn about the points stated to make a better decision. 2. There's a general passive-combative conversation about browsers going on ("I like Firefox, I don't get why people like Chrome" and vice versa) that I never wanted to be a part of, mostly because of how disrespectful and counterproductive it is. 3. In a thread about ad-blocking, I got what is effectively an ad for Firefox. I don't want any of this nonsense on my side of the table. "Use my product because I value it!" No, go away, I don't need this. My choices are rarely uninformed. I spend time considering what to pick where I'm able to. I'd like my choices to be respected as such – not have my face plastered with someone else's unprompted opinion. Here's an example of a better conversation: – I liked this part of Firefox, and I wish it was in Chrome too. – Do you not like Firefox whole, then? If so, why? – Because of X, Y, and Z. I used it intensely for a month or so, so I got a good look at the way it behaves. I know X is solvable, but not Y or Z (I tried), and they're critical to my browsing experience. – Okay, I see. I hope you consider (browser diversity, or whatever issues using Firefox's supposed to solve), because they're important. – Oh yeah? Can you tell me why? ...and so on. A respectful conversation that sparks curiosity and provides context, without annoying any of the parties in the process. Otherwise, you get what you give. Seems a fair approach to me.