3 ms·
I think they were talking about objects at execution time, not version compatibility.
by Pawamoy 8y ago
I think they were talking about objects at execution time, not version compatibility.
- dan-robertson 8y agoI don’t really understand what this means. The parent specifically writes “backwards compatibility.” The only other thing I think you might be referring to is if the reading process mutates the objects does that somehow affect the writing end of the pipe but I think that doesn’t make sense from a “sane way of doing inter-process communication” standpoint. Is there something else you are referring to? Could you elaborate please?