5 ms·

Or Elixir, or Rust, or Node. Having spent time with all of these options, Rails is still really really good for a lot of use cases. Go comes nowhere near Ruby's

by rapind 8y ago

Or Elixir, or Rust, or Node. Having spent time with all of these options, Rails is still really really good for a lot of use cases. Go comes nowhere near Ruby's readability for me (but I like the lack of surprise). Personally I'd love something typed, performant, and as readable as Ruby with a convention focused platform like Rails. Elixir + Phoenix is probably the closest I can find, but not a perfect fit. Maybe close enough though.

dmlittle 8y ago
FWIW Elixir isn't necessarily lightweight. Memory will stay pretty flat (even during high workloads) but it's not lightweight.
Legogris 8y ago
If we're talking memory usage, I don't think Node is necessarily a significant improvement over Ruby.
anonyfox 8y ago
Crystal it is. Combined with the amber framework, porting the Ruby Code should be straightforward. Yes stuff isnt even 1.0 yet, but I would seriously bet on it right now.
hazz99 8y ago
Is there a benefit learning Elixir over Erlang? I've working a little bit with Erlang, and I've wondered if its worth the jump.
- knrz 8y ago
  Completely! With convention and macros, it's a whole new language.
jamescostian 8y ago
> Go comes nowhere near Ruby's readability for me I am not fluent in either, and I'm not looking to change that, but I have read code in both. I feel the exact opposite way, and I'm not trying to start a war or anything, but I was wondering if you'd be open to talking about what things in Go you find hard to read (and what things in Ruby you find very easy to read). Or is this about libraries (are Go libraries providing lower-level APIs than Ruby ones?)? Or have you read/written a lot more code in Ruby than Go?
- hazz99 8y ago
  I agree - Go has issues, but they're not related to readability. Perhaps if you include "familiarity with the standard interfaces" (like using io.Reader) which is different to other languages, and took a while for me to get used to.

by rapind 8y ago

dmlittle 8y ago

FWIW Elixir isn't necessarily lightweight. Memory will stay pretty flat (even during high workloads) but it's not lightweight.

Legogris 8y ago

If we're talking memory usage, I don't think Node is necessarily a significant improvement over Ruby.

anonyfox 8y ago

Crystal it is. Combined with the amber framework, porting the Ruby Code should be straightforward. Yes stuff isnt even 1.0 yet, but I would seriously bet on it right now.

hazz99 8y ago

Is there a benefit learning Elixir over Erlang? I've working a little bit with Erlang, and I've wondered if its worth the jump.

knrz 8y ago
Completely! With convention and macros, it's a whole new language.

jamescostian 8y ago

> Go comes nowhere near Ruby's readability for me I am not fluent in either, and I'm not looking to change that, but I have read code in both. I feel the exact opposite way, and I'm not trying to start a war or anything, but I was wondering if you'd be open to talking about what things in Go you find hard to read (and what things in Ruby you find very easy to read). Or is this about libraries (are Go libraries providing lower-level APIs than Ruby ones?)? Or have you read/written a lot more code in Ruby than Go?

hazz99 8y ago
I agree - Go has issues, but they're not related to readability. Perhaps if you include "familiarity with the standard interfaces" (like using io.Reader) which is different to other languages, and took a while for me to get used to.