4 ms·
Thank you for that link, will read it carefully. From the first glance it feels like an attempt to cover mess with a bigger mess: > this is already a source of
by rinchik 8y ago
Thank you for that link, will read it carefully. From the first glance it feels like an attempt to cover mess with a bigger mess:
> this is already a source of enough confusion in JS; we'd prefer not to make it worse
> Property access semantics are already complicated, and we don't want to slow down every property access just to add this feature.
> [private x] in JavaScript this would silently create or access a public field
Pardon me, but # as a declaration method of privates is an abomination.
- notus 8y agoYeah I have to agree with this. I'm getting this vibe from a lot of changes to JS lately. A mess designed to cover another mess and people almost blindly supporting the new mess just because there is some logical rationale for it.