3 ms·
Twitter is the comments section most media outlets have removed. Media likes it because it's usually all about them, and screencapping it often makes their jobs
by scottlocklin 8y ago
Twitter is the comments section most media outlets have removed. Media likes it because it's usually all about them, and screencapping it often makes their jobs easier (aka "look at this twitter thread" between X and Y). Otherwise, it's disqus with a different distribution model.
Blogs are doing just fine. LJ simply became a Russian blog platform rather than and English language one. It did have some social media aspects back in the day, but it assumed a couple of standard deviation higher IQ (or at least attention span) in its users, favoring long form posts with lots of imagery. It didn't become a disgusting FB megacorp because it didn't cater to the lowest common denominator, or hire people to make it addictive. FWIIW Brad did fine.
Tools like this should be the goal, not evil garbage like FB.
- dvtrn 8y agoMedia likes it because it's usually all about them, and screencapping it often makes their jobs easier I hate how true this can be. "The internet is furious at celebrity" Article sources the entirety of two mildly annoyed nobodies on twitter.