3 ms·
Not much more details, unfortunately. What exactly was the error, how long ago has it been done, has the problem been corrected, what did the blacklist say abo
by hyperman1 8y ago
Not much more details, unfortunately.
What exactly was the error, how long ago has it been done, has the problem been corrected, what did the blacklist say about this person, and did it match reality?
The judgement was probably reasonable, based on my experience with the courts. But there are not enough facts in these 2 articles for us to form a reasonable opinion.
- mdekkers 8y agoYou can find some more information (in Dutch) at the below address. In short, the Dr. made some errors in a patient's aftercare, which lead to the probation. The lawyer of the Dr. argued that anyone on the Internet is free to attack this person, but due to patient/doctor confidentiality, the Dr. isn't free to respond. https://nos.nl/artikel/2267951-rechter-laat-google-zoekresultaten-schrappen-over-berispte-arts.html https://nos.nl/artikel/2267951-rechter-laat-google-zoekresul...