3 ms·
If you go back and read Gropius' old books about the New Architecture, the original point of steel-and-glass skyscrapers was that by building up instead of out,
by ken 8y ago
If you go back and read Gropius' old books about the New Architecture, the original point of steel-and-glass skyscrapers was that by building up instead of out, you could devote the rest of the surface to other uses, like parks or shops. There would be enough space between buildings so every window gets sunlight, and there would be livable and walkable space all around. The taller the building, the more space you need between buildings to ensure every floor gets direct light.
We've totally butchered the spirit by packing them back-to-back-to-back, and removing all the green. It's like "We took a Beethoven symphony, and made it more efficient by removing all the rests!" No, you ruined it. The space between was part of the work.
- cgy1 8y agoI think part of that is, as it turned out, how the towers in a park model (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towers_in_the_park https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towers_in_the_park) was implemented wasn't actually very conducive to human-scale living.
- deogeo 8y agoBut the abhorrent, sterile steel-and-glass isn't the only style that can be built up. The many art deco or gothic revival skyscrapers should serve as a suitable counter-example.