> It is almost universally bad, especially for kids, and should be kept to a minimum. Were you aware of this recent study[1] that seemed to draw a different co

> It is almost universally bad, especially for kids, and should be kept to a minimum. Were you aware of this recent study[1] that seemed to draw a different conclusion? > The authors’ overall calculations did find a statistically significant negative association between technology use and well-being: more screen time is associated with lower well-being in the young people surveyed. But the effects are so small — explaining at most 0.4% of the variation in well-being — as to be of little practical value. > In fact, regularly eating potatoes was almost as negatively associated with well-being as was technology use, and the negative association between wearing glasses and well-being was greater. I would think that something "almost universally bad" would present itself as more statistically significant in terms of well-being. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00137-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00137-6