Over time as they reduce the amount of spectrum allocated to 3G though reallocating spectrum to 4G, I suspect you'll find you're better off using 4G. Here in N

Over time as they reduce the amount of spectrum allocated to 3G though reallocating spectrum to 4G, I suspect you'll find you're better off using 4G. Here in New Zealand the telcos have, for some time, been reducing their 3G capacity to the bare minimum and using freed up spectrum for 4G. Before: 10–60 MHz allocated to 3G (across 850/900/2100 bands) and 20 MHz allocated to 4G (1800 band only). Now: 5–10 MHz allocated to 3G (either one of 850 or 900 bands only) and 20–60+ MHz allocated to 4G (across any number of 700/900/1800/2100/2300/2600 bands). 4G has improved here not only due to capacity being refarmed from 2G/3G (e.g. 2degrees NZ dropped 2G to provide 4G capacity at 900MHz, and Vodafone NZ has swapped their 3G 2100 MHz out for 4G 2100 MHz) but also 4G supports a wider range of frequencies including 700MHz which has improved rural signal strength. I understand generally what is happening other countries is not too much different to what's happening here. I know UK and Australia have seen similar strategies being implemented. UK Note: O2 UK shares their network with Vodafone UK, so you might like to have a look at EE UK/Three UK who also operates a shared network. In the UK most sites are operated by either one or the other (sometimes both groups cooperate and all networks are served from the same site).