Being a "tech company" has something to do with the ethos, I think, or how investors view the company. It has very little to do with "technology" (which is ubiq

Being a "tech company" has something to do with the ethos, I think, or how investors view the company. It has very little to do with "technology" (which is ubiquitous in any case). For example, Rolls-Royce does technology, but they're not a "tech stock" or a "tech company", I think, or only marginally, as I understand it. But perhaps there is no common understanding of the term. (Edit: Personally I get annoyed when some stupid web programming framework gets described as "technology". Gas turbines are proper technology, in my opinion!)