4 ms·
Meta-analyses aren't science, either. They're hardly more than commentary as it's very easy to interpret many studies in a particular way.
by apotheosis 8y ago
Meta-analyses aren't science, either. They're hardly more than commentary as it's very easy to interpret many studies in a particular way.
- james_s_tayler 8y agoOut of curiosity how does one arrive at that cognitive veiwpoint? I can't seem to find my way there. If we assume it's true for arguments sake then you can't read a meta-analysis of meta-analyses in order to reach that conclusion because such an act wouldn't be deemed a legitimate source of information... So how do you get there? What's the path to seeing things from that specific angle?