4 ms·
> This civilization has survived terrible wars in the past While that's true, I don't think any past war is remotely comparable to a 7-12 billion-strong human
by crispinb 8y ago
> This civilization has survived terrible wars in the past
While that's true, I don't think any past war is remotely comparable to a 7-12 billion-strong human population fighting to maintain unrealistic material consumption levels whilst ecosystems continue to collapse.
Only time will tell. The one thing we can be sure about re predictions on this scale is that our likelihood estimates are wrong.
> By the way i didn't down vote you
No worries - I actually wouldn't have noticed as I don't use the voting system on comments. The 'sociopathic' word might have merited it. Perhaps a bit sharp. Or maybe not - I think our 'civilisation' promotes much sociopathy as mainstream. Few of us can in practise be free of that.
- brendansafr 8y agoI upvoted the whole comment chain :) I love the high quality discussion that hackernews fosters to chime in: Russia may want to heat up the world, but would that not result in having to defend their borders from a mass migration inland? the sociopathic part might not the global warming, rather denying the refugees entrance to your country, forcing them to "drown" I ponder: may COLD rank next to water, air, food, as precious global resources?