3 ms·
TO BATTLE! Reducing it to "pro type-safety vs pro-flexibility" doesn't tell the whole story. For me, it's "pro-consistency vs pro-inconsistency" or "pro-toolin
by sickcodebruh 8y ago
TO BATTLE!
Reducing it to "pro type-safety vs pro-flexibility" doesn't tell the whole story. For me, it's "pro-consistency vs pro-inconsistency" or "pro-tooling-that-makes-sure-I-don't-screw-up-something-trivial vs pro-keeping-absolutely-everything-in-my-head-at-all-times." Of course, that's _also_ pretty superficial and unfair -- plenty of amazing work has and will be done without type safety -- but as a bonafide Kool-Aid-drinking TypeScript Cultist, I feel obligated to share that because it's made my life better.
- irascible 8y agoWhy aren't you using cross compiled Rust then?